Каморка

paw писал(а):

akela писал(а): Я конечно мог бы купить хату аналогичную той что я рентую, это стоило бы мне Н денег. В данный момент, допустим, эта сумма Н инвестирована в сток-маркет (простенько, без затей), и приносит в среднем 6% годовых. Этих шести процентов хватило бы, чтобы рентовать два таких таунхауса. Два, Карл.

Это шо миллион надо положить?

Stanislav писал(а): мне жупки чистили

BOX писал(а):
Ну раз так хорошо осведомлены, так ответье уж : да или нет. чего же от ответа уходить.

BOX писал(а):

akela писал(а): эти два варианта идентичны.

Так , стали уклонятся от курса . вернемся к теме:

https://vancouversun.com/news/local-new ... ork-in-b-c

The budget also reiterated the government’s 10-year, $40-billion national housing strategy to build 100,000 new affordable-housing units, repair 300,000 more and reduce chronic homelessness by half.

Non-resident ownership

Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp.’s latest housing market insight report grabbed headlines last week thanks to the details it provided on non-resident ownership of residential real estate in Metro Vancouver and B.C. as a whole last year.

When it comes to properties owned exclusively by non--resident owners, B.C. isn’t much different from Nova Scotia, at 3.7%. However, the report indicated that Metro Vancouver leads the country when it comes to foreign ownership, with 4.9% of residential properties owned exclusively by non-resident owners. Apartments appear to be the most appealing property type for non-resident owners; in Metro Vancouver, 8.3% are owned by non-residents. The largest concentration in the region is at the University of British Columbia (UBC), where 19.6% of apartments and 16.9% of all residential properties are foreign-owned.

This is consistent with the 2016 census data that indicated 26.6% of units at UBC were not occupied by their usual residents on census day.

But diving into the latest ownership data yields some surprising revelations.

The areas with the highest proportion of foreign-owned residences after UBC include Telegraph Creek (13.5%), Greenwood (11.9%), the West Chilcotin (11.7%) and the tiny community of Bamfield on the west coast of Vancouver Island (9.9%).

Similarly, the issue of foreign-owned condominium apartments (if an issue it is) isn’t limited to UBC or Metro Vancouver. Right up there with the double-digit rate at UBC is the area west of Greenwood to the summit of Anarchist Mountain and Big White ski resort, where 17.9% of condos have non-residdent owners.

Foreign landowners

Speculation was a big issue during the public consultation on ways to revitalize the Agricultural Land Commission and the 11.6 million acres it oversees. Concerns over purchases of protected farmland in areas like Richmond for the purpose of raising houses rather than crops tied many knickers in knots.

But data from the Canadian Housing Statistics Program of Statistics Canada indicates that Richmond ranks 25th in the province when it comes to foreign ownership of vacant residential land, at just 7%. Metro Vancouver as a whole posts a rate of 2.5%.

These seem tame compared with Lions Bay, where non-resident ownership of vacant land checks in at 25%. Greenwood follows with 19.3% of vacant land in foreign hands. Central Okanagan is in third place, with 15% of properties owned by non-residents, while Alert Bay and Dease Lake both have 14.3% of their lands owned by non-residents.

Ranks of appeal

The data regarding non-resident ownership can also be read as an indication of which markets are most desirable to outside investors. In this case, Metro Vancouver wins hands down at 4.9%.

The three other metropolitan areas in B.C. on which Statistics Canada reports all have lower rates of non-resident ownership of residential properties. To no one’s surprise, the capital region comes in second with a foreign ownership rate of 3%. Kelowna, the metropolitan hub of B.C.’s Interior, reports a foreign ownership level of 2.7%.

Marmot писал(а):

Non-resident ownership

Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp.’s latest housing market insight report grabbed headlines last week thanks to the details it provided on non-resident ownership of residential real estate in Metro Vancouver and B.C. as a whole last year.

When it comes to properties owned exclusively by non--resident owners, B.C. isn’t much different from Nova Scotia, at 3.7%. However, the report indicated that Metro Vancouver leads the country when it comes to foreign ownership, with 4.9% of residential properties owned exclusively by non-resident owners. Apartments appear to be the most appealing property type for non-resident owners; in Metro Vancouver, 8.3% are owned by non-residents. The largest concentration in the region is at the University of British Columbia (UBC), where 19.6% of apartments and 16.9% of all residential properties are foreign-owned.

This is consistent with the 2016 census data that indicated 26.6% of units at UBC were not occupied by their usual residents on census day.

But diving into the latest ownership data yields some surprising revelations.

The areas with the highest proportion of foreign-owned residences after UBC include Telegraph Creek (13.5%), Greenwood (11.9%), the West Chilcotin (11.7%) and the tiny community of Bamfield on the west coast of Vancouver Island (9.9%).

Similarly, the issue of foreign-owned condominium apartments (if an issue it is) isn’t limited to UBC or Metro Vancouver. Right up there with the double-digit rate at UBC is the area west of Greenwood to the summit of Anarchist Mountain and Big White ski resort, where 17.9% of condos have non-residdent owners.

Foreign landowners

Speculation was a big issue during the public consultation on ways to revitalize the Agricultural Land Commission and the 11.6 million acres it oversees. Concerns over purchases of protected farmland in areas like Richmond for the purpose of raising houses rather than crops tied many knickers in knots.

But data from the Canadian Housing Statistics Program of Statistics Canada indicates that Richmond ranks 25th in the province when it comes to foreign ownership of vacant residential land, at just 7%. Metro Vancouver as a whole posts a rate of 2.5%.

These seem tame compared with Lions Bay, where non-resident ownership of vacant land checks in at 25%. Greenwood follows with 19.3% of vacant land in foreign hands. Central Okanagan is in third place, with 15% of properties owned by non-residents, while Alert Bay and Dease Lake both have 14.3% of their lands owned by non-residents.

Ranks of appeal

The data regarding non-resident ownership can also be read as an indication of which markets are most desirable to outside investors. In this case, Metro Vancouver wins hands down at 4.9%.

The three other metropolitan areas in B.C. on which Statistics Canada reports all have lower rates of non-resident ownership of residential properties. To no one’s surprise, the capital region comes in second with a foreign ownership rate of 3%. Kelowna, the metropolitan hub of B.C.’s Interior, reports a foreign ownership level of 2.7%.

https://biv.com/article/2019/03/housing ... -ownership

Robots писал(а):

BOX писал(а):

akela писал(а): эти два варианта идентичны.

Так , стали уклонятся от курса . вернемся к теме:

https://vancouversun.com/news/local-new ... ork-in-b-c
The budget also reiterated the government’s 10-year, $40-billion national housing strategy to build 100,000 new affordable-housing units, repair 300,000 more and reduce chronic homelessness by half.

Ах-хххх-аааа-хххх-ааааааа

Ну, гуд лак им, хотя чего не наобещаешь гегемонам в борьбе за власть.

Robots писал(а):

Marmot писал(а): https://biv.com/article/2019/03/housing ... -ownership

Интересные цифры

Marmot писал(а):

Stanislav писал(а): мне жупки чистили

колоноскопию ты похоже теперь регулярно проходишь

BOX писал(а):
Так , стали уклонятся от курса . вернемся к теме:

https://vancouversun.com/news/local-new ... ork-in-b-c

The budget also reiterated the government’s 10-year, $40-billion national housing strategy to build 100,000 new affordable-housing units, repair 300,000 more and reduce chronic homelessness by half.

Gatchinskiy писал(а):

BOX писал(а):
Так , стали уклонятся от курса . вернемся к теме:

https://vancouversun.com/news/local-new ... ork-in-b-c

The budget also reiterated the government’s 10-year, $40-billion national housing strategy to build 100,000 new affordable-housing units, repair 300,000 more and reduce chronic homelessness by half.

это как слону дробина в масштабах страны, 60-65К новых иммигрантов прибывает каждый год в Канаду только по экономической программе + беженцы (без счета) + их родители, берем на вскидку 70-80К, через 10 лет ~ 7-8 милов дополнительно людей. Этих 100К единиц нового жилья на один Ванкувер (+ 1-1.5 million new residents in 10 years) будет мало на десятилетку, а уж по стране это размажется и не заметишь. Согласен, хорошо что хоть что-то делают в этом направлении, но уповать на это не сильно стоит... да и под понятием "100,000 new affordable-housing units", как я понял, они имеют в виду не субсидированное а "аффордабл" жилье, в зависмости от города проживания, в Ване это 3.5К за 3 бедрум, а в абботсфорде вероятно будет в половину меньше...

Robots писал(а):

Gatchinskiy писал(а):

BOX писал(а):
Так , стали уклонятся от курса . вернемся к теме:

https://vancouversun.com/news/local-new ... ork-in-b-c

The budget also reiterated the government’s 10-year, $40-billion national housing strategy to build 100,000 new affordable-housing units, repair 300,000 more and reduce chronic homelessness by half.

это как слону дробина в масштабах страны, 60-65К новых иммигрантов прибывает каждый год в Канаду только по экономической программе + беженцы (без счета) + их родители, берем на вскидку 70-80К, через 10 лет ~ 7-8 милов дополнительно людей. Этих 100К единиц нового жилья на один Ванкувер (+ 1-1.5 million new residents in 10 years) будет мало на десятилетку, а уж по стране это размажется и не заметишь. Согласен, хорошо что хоть что-то делают в этом направлении, но уповать на это не сильно стоит... да и под понятием "100,000 new affordable-housing units", как я понял, они имеют в виду не субсидированное а "аффордабл" жилье, в зависмости от города проживания, в Ване это 3.5К за 3 бедрум, а в абботсфорде вероятно будет в половину меньше...

гораздо больше прибывает ежегодно

https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-re ... eport.html

Hairy Potter писал(а):

Robots писал(а):

Gatchinskiy писал(а):

BOX писал(а):
Так , стали уклонятся от курса . вернемся к теме:

https://vancouversun.com/news/local-new ... ork-in-b-c

The budget also reiterated the government’s 10-year, $40-billion national housing strategy to build 100,000 new affordable-housing units, repair 300,000 more and reduce chronic homelessness by half.

это как слону дробина в масштабах страны, 60-65К новых иммигрантов прибывает каждый год в Канаду только по экономической программе + беженцы (без счета) + их родители, берем на вскидку 70-80К, через 10 лет ~ 7-8 милов дополнительно людей. Этих 100К единиц нового жилья на один Ванкувер (+ 1-1.5 million new residents in 10 years) будет мало на десятилетку, а уж по стране это размажется и не заметишь. Согласен, хорошо что хоть что-то делают в этом направлении, но уповать на это не сильно стоит... да и под понятием "100,000 new affordable-housing units", как я понял, они имеют в виду не субсидированное а "аффордабл" жилье, в зависмости от города проживания, в Ване это 3.5К за 3 бедрум, а в абботсфорде вероятно будет в половину меньше...

гораздо больше прибывает ежегодно

https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-re ... eport.html

Не стоит забывать о естественном убывании населения - see below, а то легко создать картину как Канада лопается от иммигрантов

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

252,338 258,821 264,333 267,213 276,689

akela писал(а):

BOX писал(а):...The budget also reiterated the government’s 10-year, $40-billion national housing strategy to build 100,000 new affordable-housing units, repair 300,000 more and reduce chronic homelessness by half.

Они ничего не могли хуже придумать? Чем тушить пожар бензином.

“ANALYSIS: Finance Minister Bill Morneau’s odd plan to help homebuyers won’t help with housing affordability” , Global
“One of the things Finance Minister Bill Morneau did in the budget on Tuesday was to take steps to fix Canada’s home ownership problem. But who told him Canada has a homeownership problem?”
“Homeownership rates in Canada are among the highest in the developed world. Even among young people, homeownership rates are high compared to our peers with more than 40 per cent of households led by people under 35 owning homes. And yes, even in Toronto and Vancouver, homeownership rates are high relative to those cities’ global peers.”