simon писал(а):Нужно обращаться в канадское посольство, а не суд (?), где есть специальное уполномоченное лицо, которое проверит все поданные документы, оправдывающие отсутствие, проведет разбирательство, расследование и вынесет решение (не зная деталей топикстартера, скорее всего о лишении, что и будет подтверждением потери статуса согласно закону). Есть возможность апелляции в IAD, (это опять не CУД, а подразделение CIC).
Итак, перечитала:
8. Overview: A31(3) travel documents; IAD processes; overseas decisions and their effect at a POE
8.1. A31(3) Travel documents
An officer outside Canada may issue a travel document in four circumstances:
1. After an examination, an officer overseas determines that a permanent resident has
complied with the residency obligation under A28. The permanent resident has lost or
is otherwise unable to use their IMM 1000B for travel back to Canada before
December 31, 2003 and the permanent resident is not in possession of a permanent
resident card [A31(3)(a)].
2. After an examination, an officer overseas determines that a permanent resident has
failed to comply with the residency obligation under A28. The officer, however, has
determined that the H&C factors overcome the breach of the residency obligation and
justify the retention of permanent resident status [A31(3)(b)].
3. After an examination, an officer overseas has arrived at a decision that a permanent
resident has failed to comply with the residency obligation under A28. The permanent
resident is not in possession of a permanent resident card. The officer is satisfied that
the permanent resident was physically present in Canada at least once within the
365 days before the examination. An appeal to the IAD filed under A63(4) has not
been finally determined or the period for making such an appeal has not yet expired
[A31(3)(c)].
Note: IAD Rule 9(3) – In the case of a permanent resident who wants to appeal a decision made
outside Canada concerning the residency obligation, the IAD must receive the notice of appeal no
later than 60 days after the appellant received the written reasons for the decision.
4. After an examination, an officer overseas has arrived at a decision that a permanent
resident has failed to comply with the residency obligation under A28. The permanent
resident is not in possession of a permanent resident card. The officer is not satisfied
that the permanent resident was physically present in Canada at least once within the
365 days before the examination. The permanent resident has filed an appeal with the
IAD under A63(4) within the prescribed time period, and
the IAD has ordered the
presence of the permanent resident in Canada to attend at their appeal hearing
[A175(2)].
Further, on item No. 4 above, and pursuant to A175(2),
when an appellant is not eligible for a
travel document under A31(3), they must make an application to the IAD requesting that they be
allowed to return to Canada for their hearing [IAD Rule 46(1)]. Applications must be filed with the
IAD and the Minister no later than 60 days after the notice of appeal is filed.
If the IAD is satisfied that the presence of the permanent resident at the hearing is necessary,
it
will order that the permanent resident physically appear at the hearing. Where the IAD has
ordered
that the appellant be physically present, an officer shall issue a travel document for that
purpose pursuant to A175(2).
P.S. So, арбитражное, судебное, whatever,
слушание по вопросам иммиграции (коротко, суд) имеет место быть in Canada, для чего в канадском посольстве outside Canada запрашивается travel document to entry Canada, после чего должна быть подана аппеляция, которая within 60 days должна быть принятой к рассмотрению, чтобы назначить слушание по делу, на котором нужно физически присутствовать.
