Каморка

Алексей K-K писал(а):

elena S. писал(а): нельзя предугадать поступки глупых людей.

Если людьми манипулировать то поступки просчитываются как не фиг делать, глупый или умный без разницы. Проблема возникнет если человек умней и разбирается в теме лучше чем рассчитывали.

Victor Okunev писал(а):Вот еще один закон - чем больше рассуждать о природе глупости, тем проще самому не попасть под подозрение

elena S. писал(а):под чье подозрение?
глупых? или умных?

elena S. писал(а):умными людьми, говорят, манипулировать тяжело.

Vims писал(а):очень красивая женщина или далее по списку :) :D

Проф. Преображенский писал(а):В принципе, любой поступок проецируется на ось глупости (умности). При том, что глупость - относительна.

Victoria писал(а):об очевидном капитане
=)

magda писал(а):.
Так в чём же природа глупости, автор темы?

Victoria писал(а):...
где-то там была открытка об очевидном капитане
=)

Kiseta писал(а):

Victoria писал(а):...
где-то там была открытка об очевидном капитане
=)

Его повысили в звании капитан теперь, адмирал, Адмирал Ясенпень

---- A stupid person is a person who causes losses to another person or to a group of persons while himself deriving no gain and even possibly incurring losses. ----

When confronted for the first time with the Basic Law, rational people instinctively react with feelings of skepticism and incredulity.
The fact is that reasonable people have difficulty in conceiving and understanding unreasonable behavior.

But let us abandon the lofty plane of theory and let us look pragmatically at our daily life.

We all recollect occasions in which a fellow took an action which resulted in his gain and our loss:
we had to deal with a bandit.

We also recollect cases in which a fellow took an action which resulted in his loss and our gain:
we had to deal with a helpless person.

We can recollect cases in which a fellow took an action by which both parties gained:
he was intelligent.

Such cases do indeed occur. But upon thoughtful reflection you must admit that these are not the events which punctuate most frequently our daily life.

Our daily life is mostly, made of cases in which we lose money and/or time and/or energy and/or appetite, cheerfulness and good health because of the improbable action of some preposterous creature who has nothing to gain and indeed gains nothing from causing us embarrassment, difficulties or harm.
Nobody knows, understands or can possibly explain why that preposterous creature does what he does.

In fact there is no explanation - or better there is only one explanation:
the person in question is stupid.

elena S. писал(а):разницу понимаете между helpless и глупым?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1168853/posts

---- A stupid person is a person who causes losses to another person or to a group of persons while himself deriving no gain and even possibly incurring losses. ----

When confronted for the first time with the Basic Law, rational people instinctively react with feelings of skepticism and incredulity.
The fact is that reasonable people have difficulty in conceiving and understanding unreasonable behavior.

But let us abandon the lofty plane of theory and let us look pragmatically at our daily life.

We all recollect occasions in which a fellow took an action which resulted in his gain and our loss:
we had to deal with a bandit.

We also recollect cases in which a fellow took an action which resulted in his loss and our gain:
we had to deal with a helpless person.

We can recollect cases in which a fellow took an action by which both parties gained:
he was intelligent.

Such cases do indeed occur. But upon thoughtful reflection you must admit that these are not the events which punctuate most frequently our daily life.

Our daily life is mostly, made of cases in which we lose money and/or time and/or energy and/or appetite, cheerfulness and good health because of the improbable action of some preposterous creature who has nothing to gain and indeed gains nothing from causing us embarrassment, difficulties or harm.
Nobody knows, understands or can possibly explain why that preposterous creature does what he does.

In fact there is no explanation - or better there is only one explanation:
the person in question is stupid.