Каморка

pin писал(а): ↑05 дек 2020, 19:49

Akrav писал(а):Многих волнует вопрос, что стоит за пандемией Ковид-19. Я постараюсь рассказать как я вижу эту ситуацию.
Отсюда: https://cont.ws/@tarbal/1853494

а бабай - это ваш революционный псевдоним?

Akrav писал(а): ↑09 дек 2020, 09:57 Бидон сосет и причмокивает:

[YouTubeI5n_vOPXHR4[/YouTube]

simon писал(а): ↑09 дек 2020, 13:38 Верховный суд США единодушно отклонил иск группы республиканцев по отмене результатов выборов в Пенсильвании, поставив окончательную точку всем искам.

LeoV писал(а): ↑09 дек 2020, 13:57

Akrav писал(а): ↑09 дек 2020, 09:57 Бидон сосет и причмокивает:

[YouTubeI5n_vOPXHR4[/YouTube]

simon писал(а): ↑09 дек 2020, 13:38 Верховный суд США единодушно отклонил иск группы республиканцев по отмене результатов выборов в Пенсильвании, поставив окончательную точку всем искам.

не долго музыка играла...

Gadi писал(а): ↑09 дек 2020, 14:00

LeoV писал(а): ↑09 дек 2020, 13:57

Akrav писал(а): ↑09 дек 2020, 09:57 Бидон сосет и причмокивает:

[YouTubeI5n_vOPXHR4[/YouTube]

simon писал(а): ↑09 дек 2020, 13:38 Верховный суд США единодушно отклонил иск группы республиканцев по отмене результатов выборов в Пенсильвании, поставив окончательную точку всем искам.

не долго музыка играла...

А там разве не о разных исках речь идет?

Officials in the states targeted in the suit — Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania — derided it as nothing more than an unfounded publicity stunt.

The lawsuit may be a typically adept Trump move to get attention, but election law experts said he has little chance of getting the Supreme Court to support his move.

As election law expert Richard Hasen put it about the Texas filing, "This is a press release masquerading as a lawsuit. ... What utter garbage. Dangerous garbage, but garbage."

Just how little legal support there is for the lawsuit is evidenced by who signed the briefs asking the high court to intervene. Trump's brief was not signed by acting Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall or any other Justice Department official. Rather, the brief was signed by John Eastman, a conservative law professor at Chapman University. (A Trump campaign statement said the president intervened "in his personal capacity as candidate for re-election.")

The Texas brief was not signed by the state's solicitor general, Kyle Hawkins. Paxton, who signed the Texas brief, remains under indictment over securities fraud and is also facing an FBI investigation on bribery and abuse of office allegations.

All of the briefs filed so far are in the form of a motion seeking permission to sue the states in the Supreme Court. As legal experts have noted, it is unclear what legal standing Trump, Texas or the 17 states supporting their move have for challenging the results of elections in other states.

Moreover, with the Electoral College slated to meet next week, this legal action amounts to little more than an eleventh hour Hail Mary pass. It is more like trying to stop the stop the game clock from ticking when all the players are walking off the field.

simon писал(а): ↑09 дек 2020, 16:57 Это не Suite, а трюк, рассчитаный на легковерных сторонников, возбуждающихся от каждого слова клоуна.
Поезд ушел

Officials in the states targeted in the suit — Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania — derided it as nothing more than an unfounded publicity stunt.

The lawsuit may be a typically adept Trump move to get attention, but election law experts said he has little chance of getting the Supreme Court to support his move.

As election law expert Richard Hasen put it about the Texas filing, "This is a press release masquerading as a lawsuit. ... What utter garbage. Dangerous garbage, but garbage."

Just how little legal support there is for the lawsuit is evidenced by who signed the briefs asking the high court to intervene. Trump's brief was not signed by acting Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall or any other Justice Department official. Rather, the brief was signed by John Eastman, a conservative law professor at Chapman University. (A Trump campaign statement said the president intervened "in his personal capacity as candidate for re-election.")

The Texas brief was not signed by the state's solicitor general, Kyle Hawkins. Paxton, who signed the Texas brief, remains under indictment over securities fraud and is also facing an FBI investigation on bribery and abuse of office allegations.

All of the briefs filed so far are in the form of a motion seeking permission to sue the states in the Supreme Court. As legal experts have noted, it is unclear what legal standing Trump, Texas or the 17 states supporting their move have for challenging the results of elections in other states.


Moreover, with the Electoral College slated to meet next week, this legal action amounts to little more than an eleventh hour Hail Mary pass. It is more like trying to stop the stop the game clock from ticking when all the players are walking off the field.

Akrav писал(а):Информационные помойки начали сдавать Бидона.

pin писал(а): ↑09 дек 2020, 18:32

Akrav писал(а):Информационные помойки начали сдавать Бидона.

Уже когда все каморкинские симпатизанты Клоуна сдулись, только один акрав верил в победу... Ну когда уже, наконец, падёт Бидон?