Каморка

Victoria писал(а):Friday, July 30, 2010 11:57am
Two Canadian fighter jets raced to repel Russian bombers that made several attempts to probe Canadian airspace on Wednesday. The CF-18s took off from CFB Bagotville to intercept two TU-95 long-range bombers about 463 km east of Goose Bay, N.L. Attempts by Russia to test Canadian airspace have been going on sine 2007, and have increased in frequency since then. Defence Minister Peter MacKay said the Russians didn’t give Canada any advance notice of the probe, but stressed that although the planes did not enter Canada’s sovereign airspace, the bombers did come inside the 300 nautical mile zone that Canada claims. The TU-95 bomber is capable of carrying nuclear weapons and may have been loaded with warheads on this trip. MacKay said the government wasn’t aware what, if any, weapons were on board. Canada is in a race with Russia and other Arctic nations to lay claim to the frozen territory that may hold untold treasures.
http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/30/cana ... ace-probe/

Проф. Преображенский писал(а):Сшибать надо!

simon писал(а):
Министр выдыеленные 9 млрд на перевооружение военно-воздушного флота Канады отрабатывает

simon писал(а):

Проф. Преображенский писал(а):Сшибать надо!

На каком законном основании можно "сшибать" в международном воздушном пространстве?

the bombers did come inside the 300 nautical mile zone that Canada claims

Проф. Преображенский писал(а):

simon писал(а):

Проф. Преображенский писал(а):Сшибать надо!

На каком законном основании можно "сшибать" в международном воздушном пространстве?

the bombers did come inside the 300 nautical mile zone that Canada claims

Sheen писал(а):"Это всё ваши хотелки." (авторство известно)

Article 58 of the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea promulgated in 1982 says, foreign aircraft enjoy the freedom of overflight under the relevant provisions of the Convention.

Section Three of that article made it clear that foreign planes, while enjoying the freedom of overflight over an exclusive economic zone of other countries, “ shall have due regard to the rights and duties of the coastal State and shall comply with the laws and regulations adopted by the coastal State in accordance with the provisions of this Convention and other rules of international law in so far as they are not incompatible with this part.”

According to Article 56 of the Convention, the coastal country concerned not only has the right to exploit, utilize, maintain and administer natural resources in its exclusive economic zone, but also enjoys other rights concerning exclusive economic zones laid down by the Convention, it says.

In accordance with Article 301 of the Convention, any country, while enjoying its rights or carrying out its duties stipulated by the Convention, “shall refrain from any threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the principles of international law embodied in the Charter of United Nations,” the article says.

This article demonstrates that the “other rights” concerning exclusive economic zone of coastal states include that the sovereignty and territorial integrity of these countries should not be infringed upon, and they have the right to safeguard its national security and maintain peaceful order as stipulated in international law.

The article says that a plane of a state, while it exercises freedom of overflight in the air over the exclusive economic zone of the other state, should respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the coastal state. It can’t infringe upon national security and peaceful order of the coastal state, and any act ignoring the above rights of the coastal country will constitute an abuse of the freedom of overflight, says the article.

Sheen писал(а):У канады нет беспилотников, они в Альберте попадали на линии эл.передач.

Правильные пацаны писал(а):

не так все просто.