http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20090101f ... -2008.htmlThe crisis' underlying cause was the (invariably lethal) combination of very low interest rates and unprecedented levels of liquidity. The low interest rates reflected the U.S. government's overly accommodating monetary policy after 9/11. (The U.S. Federal Reserve lowered the federal funds rate to nearly one percent in late 2001 and maintained it near that very low level for three years.) The liquidity reflected, among other factors, what Federal Reserve Chair Ben Bernanke has called "the global savings glut": the enormous financial surpluses realized by certain countries, particularly China, Singapore, and the oil-producing states of the Persian Gulf. Until the mid-1990s, most emerging economies ran balance-of-payments deficits as they imported capital to finance their growth. But the Asian financial crisis of 1997-98, among other things, changed this in much of Asia. After that, surpluses grew throughout the region and then were consistently recycled back to the West in the form of portfolio investments.
Facing low yields, this mountain of liquidity naturally sought higher ones. One basic law of finance is that yields on loans are inversely proportional to credit quality: the stronger the borrower, the lower the yield, and vice versa. Huge amounts of capital thus flowed into the subprime mortgage sector and toward weak borrowers of all types in the United States, in Europe, and, to a lesser extent, around the world. For example, the annual volume of U.S. subprime and other securitized mortgages rose from a long-term average of approximately $100 billion to over $600 billion in 2005 and 2006. As with all financial bubbles, the lessons of history, including about long-term default rates on such poor credits, were ignored.
This flood of mortgage money caused residential and commercial real estate prices to rise at unprecedented rates. Whereas the average U.S. home had appreciated at 1.4 percent annually over the 30 years before 2000, the appreciation rate roared forward at 7.6 percent annually from 2000 through mid-2006. From mid-2005 to mid-2006, amid rampant speculation in the housing market, it was 11 percent.
But like most spikes in commodity prices, this one eventually reversed itself -- and with a vengeance. Housing prices have been falling sharply for over two years, and so far there is no sign that they will bottom out. Futures markets are signaling that, from peak to trough, the drop in the value of the nation's housing stock could reach 30-35 percent. This would be an astonishing fall for a pool of assets once valued at $13 trillion.
This collapse in housing prices undermined the value of the multitrillion-dollar pool of lower-value mortgages that had been created over the 2003-6 period. In addition, countless subprime mortgages that were structured to be artificially cheap at the outset began to convert to more expensive terms. Innumerable borrowers could not afford the adjusted terms, and delinquencies became more frequent. Losses on these loans began to emerge in mid-2007 and quickly grew to staggering levels. And with prices in real estate and other asset values still dropping, the value of these loans is continuing to deteriorate. The larger financial institutions are reporting continuous losses. They mark down the value of a loan or similar asset in one quarter, only to mark it down again in the next. This self-reinforcing downward cycle has caused markets to plunge across the globe.
Интересное упрощенное объяснение причин текущего кризиса
Правила форума
Пожалуйста, ознакомьтесь с правилами данного форума
Пожалуйста, ознакомьтесь с правилами данного форума
- Marmot
- Графоман
- Сообщения: 39290
- Зарегистрирован: 17 фев 2003, 17:58
- Откуда: Caulfeild
- Контактная информация:
Интересное упрощенное объяснение причин текущего кризиса
-
- Житель
- Сообщения: 929
- Зарегистрирован: 20 июл 2005, 21:48
- Откуда: издалека-->Vancouver,Canada
Re: Интересное упрощенное объяснение причин текущего кризиса
Однако, имеется еще один упрощенный взгляд на эту ситуацию:
"The Big Ideas of 2009", Adbusters. "The crisis" by Herman Daly:
" the turmoil affecting the world economy unleashed by the US sub-prime debt crisis isn't really a crisis of "liquidity"
as it often called. A liquidity crisis would imply that the economy was in trouble because businesses could no longer
obtain credit and loans to finance their investments. In fact, the crisis is the rwesult of the overgrouth of financial assets
relative to grouth of real wealth-basically the opposite of too little liquidity"
Хотя в России это проявляется именно в )дефиците ликвидности, особенно на окраинах империи.
"The Big Ideas of 2009", Adbusters. "The crisis" by Herman Daly:
" the turmoil affecting the world economy unleashed by the US sub-prime debt crisis isn't really a crisis of "liquidity"
as it often called. A liquidity crisis would imply that the economy was in trouble because businesses could no longer
obtain credit and loans to finance their investments. In fact, the crisis is the rwesult of the overgrouth of financial assets
relative to grouth of real wealth-basically the opposite of too little liquidity"
Хотя в России это проявляется именно в )дефиците ликвидности, особенно на окраинах империи.