http://www.examiner.com/x-36199-Conspir ... tigate-911
народ взялся писать петиции в главные СМИ которые почему-то молчат на эту темуOver 1000 architects and engineers have signed petition to reinvestigate 9-11 destruction
Physics professor, Dr. Stephen Jones, along with an international team of scientists, analyzed World Trade Center dust from several sources and claims they found unmistakable traces of nanothermitic composite material--explosives that could be used to demolish the three skyscrapers. He and other architects and engineers say this explains the pools of molten metal found at ground zero weeks after the incident.
http://www.bollyn.com/9-11-archive-2009#article_12026
To: Mr. Clark Hoyt, Public Editor, The New York Times
620 Eighth Ave., New York, NY 10018
public@nytimes.com
(212) 556-7652
An Open Letter to The New York Times
from Christopher Bollyn
April 21, 2009
Ignoring the Evidence of Super-Thermite from the World Trade Center
Re: "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe," by Steven E. Jones, Niels H Harrit, et al, The Open Chemical Physics Journal, Vol. 2, February 13, 2009
Dear Mr. Hoyt and Editors of The New York Times and International Herald Tribune:
How can the New York Times completely ignore the scientific evidence of nano-thermite, or super-thermite, found in the dust of the demolished and pulverized rubble of the World Trade Center? Do you consider this crucial scientific discovery irrelevant to the understanding of what happened on 9-11?
A recent study written by 9 scientists, including Dr. Steven E. Jones, has proven that chips of a highly-explosive thermitic material, "characterized as nano-thermite or super-thermite," were found in five different samples of dust from the collapsed towers of the World Trade Center. This paper, which passed a peer review and was published in The Open Chemical Physics Journal, is an historic breakthrough in the scientific investigation of the explosive collapses of the twin towers, yet not a single word about it has been published in the New York Times.
http://www.thestar.com/opinion/letters/ ... s-evidence
Re: 9/11 skeptics head to Canada, May 1
Many thanks for the article detailing the appearance of David Ray Griffin and Richard Gage at three universities in Canada. I, like millions of others, am still waiting for a mainstream paper to fully attend to the details of what these men are saying. Lay out the evidence, please.
It does no good to offer comments from detractors that “they are imposters, liars and con-men.” Are they? Show us why this is so. We no longer react to serious questions based on emotion.
These men are arguing based on the evidence collected. Any detractor must counter the evidence, not simply smear their character. Of particular seriousness is the collapse of WTC 7 and the evidence of explosive thermitic material found in four separate dust samples collected from ground zero.
